ScanFlo

Resources/Protocols

Routine brain (MRI head)

The general brain survey and the exam every other head protocol is built on. Master its positioning, planning lines and sequence order and the specialised studies become deliberate variations rather than new exams.

Protocols/Brain

When this study is used

  • Headache, first seizure, new confusion or altered mental state.
  • Suspected space-occupying lesion or raised intracranial pressure.
  • Non-specific neurology where broad contrast coverage is needed.
  • Follow-up imaging when no dedicated protocol is indicated.

Patient & coil positioning

  • Patient head-first and supine, in a dedicated head or head–neck coil.
  • Immobilise the head with pads so the interpupillary line is horizontal and there is no roll.
  • Centre the alignment light on the glabella (roughly the nasion–brow).
  • Give the patient the alarm ball and hearing protection; explain the acoustic noise before the first sequence.

Localizer

Acquire a three-plane localizer (axial, sagittal, coronal) and confirm the mid-sagittal slice truly bisects the brain — every planning line below is drawn on these images, so a rolled or off-centre localizer propagates error into the whole exam.

Sequence planning

Each sequence below lists how the slice group is positioned — the reference line it follows, its coverage, and why it earns its place in the protocol. Plan against the localizer, not by eye.

Axial DWI + ADC

Axial

Planning — Angle parallel to the AC–PC line on the sagittal localizer; cover vertex to foramen magnum. Plan first and scan early — it answers the most time-critical question and tolerates motion least.

Why — Acute infarct, abscess and highly cellular tumour via restricted diffusion, confirmed against the ADC map.

Axial T2 FLAIR

Axial

Planning — Same AC–PC angulation and coverage as the DWI so the two compare slice-for-slice. Verify the inversion time nulls CSF on the localizer field strength.

Why — Periventricular and cortical lesions, gliosis and oedema against suppressed CSF — the workhorse of demyelination and small-vessel disease.

Axial T2 TSE

Axial

Planning — Parallel to the genu and splenium of the corpus callosum, checked in two perpendicular planes; whole brain, no vertex gap.

Why — General anatomy, CSF spaces and the broadest pathology contrast in the exam.

Sagittal T1 SE/TSE

Sagittal

Planning — Aligned to the interhemispheric fissure on the axial and coronal localizers so slices run true mid-line outward.

Why — Midline anatomy, corpus callosum, pituitary region, marrow signal and subacute blood.

Coronal T2 or FLAIR

Coronal

Planning — Perpendicular to the AC–PC line; angled to the target when a specific structure (temporal lobes, ventricles) is in question.

Why — A second orthogonal view that resolves partial-volume ambiguity from the axial stack.

Axial T2* GRE or SWI

Axial

Planning — Match the axial coverage; low flip angle. Keep it away from the very end of the exam if the patient is restless.

Why — Haemorrhage, calcification and microbleeds through susceptibility contrast.

Representative parameters

Ranges, not commandments — field strength, coil and vendor move the numbers. What must not move is understanding why each sits where it does.

SequenceTR (ms)TE (ms)Slice / gapNotes
T1 SE400–6508–154–5 mm / 10–30%Short/short — anatomy, subacute blood
T2 TSE3000–600080–1204–5 mm / 10–30%Long/long — most pathology
FLAIR8000–1100080–1404–5 mm / 10–30%TI ≈ 2000–2500 ms nulls CSF
DWI (EPI)3000–600060–1004–5 mm / 10–30%b = 0 and 1000 s/mm²
T2* / SWI600–80015–254–5 mmLow flip; susceptibility-sensitive

Artifacts & how to fix them

ArtifactTypical causeMitigation
Motion / ghostingRestless patient, long sequence late in examFront-load DWI/FLAIR; reassure; consider PROPELLER/BLADE
SusceptibilityAir–bone interfaces, dental work, EPI DWISpin echo where possible; shorten TE; wider bandwidth
CSF flowPulsatile CSF in aqueduct/ventricles on FLAIRFlow compensation; check against T2
Chemical shiftFat–water at high bandwidth mismatchWiden receive bandwidth or fat-suppress
Wrap-aroundHead wider than the phase FOVEnlarge FOV or enable phase oversampling

What am I looking at?

You are not reporting the study, but recognising pathology helps you keep it in the field of view and know when to add a sequence or contrast. How the common findings read on the console:

FindingSequence to checkHow it reads
Acute strokeDWI + ADCBright on DWI, dark on ADC (true restriction)
TumourT1 post-contrastEnhances white, often with dark surrounding oedema on T2
AbscessDWIRestricts and stays bright, like an infarct
DemyelinationSagittal FLAIRBright ovoid spots touching the corpus callosum

Review checklist

  • Whole brain covered vertex to foramen magnum, no gap at the convexity.
  • Left–right symmetry on the axial stack — asymmetry means a rolled plan, not pathology.
  • Grey–white differentiation clear on T1 and T2.
  • FLAIR CSF fully nulled; if bright, the TI is wrong for the field strength.
  • DWI and ADC agree — true restriction is bright on DWI and dark on ADC.
  • Laterality labelled and verified against the localizer before filming.

Mistakes that cost repeats

  • Un-angled axials cut oblique to AC–PC, making follow-up comparison unreliable.
  • A vertex gap from starting the stack a slice too low.
  • FLAIR with the wrong inversion time — CSF stays bright and the sequence becomes a noisy T2.
  • Leaving the motion-intolerant sequences (DWI, FLAIR) until last.

Common questions

Why align the axial stack to the AC–PC line?
Because comparability is diagnostic. Slices angled to the anterior–posterior commissure line reproduce the same anatomy on every visit and every scanner, so follow-up exams compare slice-for-slice.
Why does DWI come first in a routine brain protocol?
It answers the most time-critical question — acute infarct — and tolerates motion the least. If the exam ends early, DWI plus FLAIR already carries most of the clinical value.
What inversion time nulls CSF on FLAIR?
Roughly 2000–2500 ms at common field strengths. If CSF stays bright, the TI is wrong for your field strength — correct it before repeating the sequence.
How many slices cover an adult brain?
About 24–32 axial slices at 4–5 mm thickness with a 10–30% gap, planned from above the vertex down to the foramen magnum.

Try it in ScanFlo: Load the head routine case. Plan an axial stack aligned to AC–PC, then a second deliberately mis-angled by 15°, and scan both — compare how the ventricles and basal ganglia change shape. That difference is why the alignment standard exists.

← All brain studies