Study Advisor
From the clinical question to the right protocol.
An AI/ML advisor that reasons the way a senior radiographer does: it takes the presenting complaint, checks the red flags, states what the images must show, and recommends the examination and the sequences it requires — with every step visible so learners see the reasoning, not just the answer.
How it works
Three steps, on a real console workflow.
Enter the clinical question
Type the presentation — “headache”, “low back pain with radiculopathy” — or pick it from the registration form. The advisor matches it to a clinical pathway.
Work the red flags
Thunderclap onset, new headache over 50, focal deficit, immunosuppression — the flags that decide whether and how the patient is imaged. The recommendation depends on your answers.
Read the recommendation
What this could be, what the images must show, and the examination that answers it — down to which sequences are required and which are recommended, cross-checked against the case data on the console.
What the advisor reasons about
| Input | Reasoning | What it teaches |
|---|---|---|
| Presenting complaint | Mapped to a clinical pathway | Justification starts with the question, not the modality |
| Red flags | Change the urgency and the protocol | Which findings escalate an examination |
| Differentials | What the images must exclude or assess | Why each sequence is in the protocol |
| Recommended examination | Required vs. recommended sequences | Protocol building with clinical intent |
In the classroom
How programs use it
- Give the cohort one presentation and have each learner defend the advisor's protocol — or argue against it.
- Use red-flag variations of the same complaint to show how a protocol escalates.
- Pair the advisor with the case library: justify the study, then perform it.
Learn the concepts
Short guides that pair with this feature:
Put your learners at the console today.
Free student tier. No installs. Runs in any browser.